Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moon+ reader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:50, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moon+ reader

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not yet notable mobile application. After a contested prod, the article was expanded without refs and still looks like all those semi automatic blogs and feature listings Google turns up. Reliable sources seem scarce, best I found is this [1] (in german) but it's still a mere specialized blog. Tikiwont (talk) 18:15, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:04, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:15, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. A Cnet blog is a reliable source, but the coverage is only borderline substantial. Mobile apps are numerous and fleeting so multiple sources should generally be required to establish notability. --Pnm (talk) 00:40, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.