Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Tahir
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 02:39, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Muhammad Tahir (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable as per Wikipedia Policy (WP:N); I can't find considerable "reliable" sources to show notability enough to add the biography to Wikipedia BurhanAhmed (talk • contribs) 10:11, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note to Admin - This article was nominated for deletion without the AFD notice on the article. I have just added the AFD notice in the article, and this AFD should be extended accordingly. -- Whpq (talk) 21:28, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The article appears legitimate. Assuming notability in Pakistan, with no English references, is sufficient. There probably are some English references, but they may be hard to find, as the editor who created the article has not given much information in their citation. I will look at it some more. Aquib (talk) 14:07, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.