Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muses Review
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 03:39, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Muses Review (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) â (View log)
Non-notable American magazine. I couldn't find enough coveraqge from independent reliable sources about it. Algébrico (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. âAlgĂ©brico (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. âAlgĂ©brico (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. âAlgĂ©brico (talk) 11:22, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of reliable independent sources to establish notability. Possible A7 speedy as article on Web content with no assertion of importance or significance. If I were feeling particularly uncharitable, I'd suggest that this was a scam to extract prize-entry fees, book-reviewing fees, etc., from clueless "authors." For a laugh, scroll down to the "Recall Policy" (section VIII) here. Deor (talk) 11:59, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Niteshift36 (talk) 14:29, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.