Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oak Tree Village
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mangojuicetalk 15:55, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oak_Tree_Village (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) - (View log)
seems like spam to me. Postcard Cathy 00:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:12, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as speculative, WP:Not#future. Bearian 18:20, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam -- that this is advertising before the event makes it a little more deleteable, but an article of this sort is advertising beyond the hope of rescue. There is nothing that could possibly be used for a real article --not even the location is given "its exact location is kept a secret to the general public. " --not even the proposed size "At this point, the Oak Tree Village consists of two tree-huts, neither of which is fully completed, and a large, permanent teepee." -- not even the sponsors " Everyone is encouraged to create or join a non-profit community". I don't often add a speedy tag, but if I had noticed this I would have. DGG 00:46, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral Agree with all above, though this is a real proposed community, so for this reason it should stay. Smcafirst | Chit-Chat | SIGN posted at 20:09, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: other gated communities have been deleted as not wiki worthy in the past. Why is this different? Just curious. Postcard cathy who is just dropping by and hasn't signed in yet. 172.145.123.22 21:17, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.