Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Aztecs Rugby Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:02, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Old Aztecs Rugby Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of available sources suggests that the subject fails to meet WP:ORG. - Mr X 16:55, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (announce) @ 21:20, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable. I could not find any reliable sources which are the subject of this article, nor could I find any references to its notability. Elspamo4 (talk) 00:43, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, why was this not PROD'd instead of brought to AfD? Either way, did not find any tertiary reliable sources that provide the subject of this AfD in-depth or significant coverage as required to meet WP:GNG. Appears to fail WP:NRU. Although a member of Southern California Rugby Football Union#First Division Men, it fails to be a "High Performance Union". --RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 21:22, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not seem to meet the notability criteria for a non-professional athletic team. --MelanieN (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.