Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenMoHAA
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:40, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OpenMoHAA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable software that hasn't even been implemented yet. Notability and primarysources tags have been languishing since March 2009. Psychonaut (talk) 23:24, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This one is a borderline speedy in my opinion. JBsupreme (talk) 23:28, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Under what criterion could it be speedied? We have one for non-notable people, companies, web content, and music, but not one for software. —Psychonaut (talk) 00:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- IMHO CSD A7 should be extended to software. JBsupreme (talk) 00:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- My thoughts exactly. But until it is granted such an extension, it would be improper to use it for that purpose. —Psychonaut (talk) 00:31, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- IMHO CSD A7 should be extended to software. JBsupreme (talk) 00:24, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Under what criterion could it be speedied? We have one for non-notable people, companies, web content, and music, but not one for software. —Psychonaut (talk) 00:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. Nifboy (talk) 00:54, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow Talk 01:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Maybe next year or the year after it will be notable software; right now it is just a good intention. LotLE×talk 01:55, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 03:28, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nominator. No significant coverage has been found. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.