Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Cash
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. JForget 02:07, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Peter Cash (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem notable outside his band work..no need to a stand alone article. Moxy (talk) 19:32, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem is that he's been in more than one notable band, meaning that we can't privilege one band over the other as a redirect target. Bearcat (talk) 01:05, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 15:40, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Passes crierion 6 of WP:MUSICBIO, as pointed out by Bearcat above, he has been a member of two or more independently notable ensembles. I just added two references to the article establishing his involvement. J04n(talk page) 15:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Criterion 6 and supporting refs for this. Voceditenore (talk) 19:45, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. —Argolin (talk) 11:48, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. The article could use some more citations, but sources do exist, including Billboard magazine, the Canadian Pop Encyclopedia, The Ottawa Citizen, among others. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 15:45, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.