Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PhpWCMS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:51, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PhpWCMS

Non-notable software product, generic without external coverage. MBisanz ^talk 02:18, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: All that I can find is trivial mentions. Fails WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No significant coverage for this. Triplestop x3 02:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I couldn't find any coverage for this piece of software online. No references given that prove notability. Netalarmtalk 03:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
No Delete I am the developer and author of that cms. phpwcms has significant coverage but without that typical marketing tamtam like other systems. The community tries to fix current Wikipedia entries. It is always hard to trace all entries... Slackero 16:07, 11 August 2009 (CEST)

If the software does indeed have significant coverage, I should be able to find it using Google, which is not the case. Also, as the developer, you would have a conflict of interest with the subject. Netalarmtalk 14:48, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Netalarm and Triplestop. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:05, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above and WP:SNOW - Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 17:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.