Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Port Augusta Re-Imagines

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Port Augusta Re-Imagines

fails WP:N, gnews search yields nothing [1], google search mainly some directory listings as an event and limited coverage like this [2]. LibStar (talk) 07:08, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- The leftorium 10:41, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/delete - if there is anything sourcable about the article, merge to a culture section in Port Augusta, South Australia. florrie 14:31, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:04, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A one-off event, nothing in the content indicates sustained ongoing notability. It will be forgotten as soon as it finishes. WWGB (talk) 05:32, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a single event that doesn't seem to have garnered much attention, even locally. Anything sourceable or significant can easily be accomodated at Port Augusta, South Australia.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.