Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power System Analysis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:23, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Power System Analysis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An essay about an unnotable subject. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 11:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Half essay, half list of items I have no idea what they mean. I think it is notable, as evidenced by the Google Scholar hits here, but would need a complete rewrite right now. fetchcomms☛ 16:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. "Power System Analysis" may in fact be a notable enough topic for an entry, but this particluar entry barely covers this topic beyond the lead, it's largely a strung-together collection of factoids and lists. This is salvagable only with a complete re-write. Hairhorn (talk) 16:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I get the feeling that this might have been created by a student who had written an essay for school and reproduced it here, see how one of the two references is a college course. Frankly I don't see how this article differs from power flow study, which seems like the same thing (the lead even says, "it analyses the power system"). -- Atama頭 20:51, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete You can analyse anything; "Sausage Analysis" etc. If there was anything worthwhile, it'd belong in an article on power systems. Student essay; unreferenced; nothing here to salvage. Chzz ► 02:06, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.