Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Power supply unit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Nomination withdrawn. Deathphoenix ʕ 04:44, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that Power supply would best be titled Power supply unit; this redirect page needs to get out of the way so that Power supply can be moved. ~ Booyabazooka 06:28, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment you could always just swap the content of the two pages. There's a note regarding that in Talk:Power supply that was left earlier today. Give it a couple days and see what other people think. If there are no objections, then be WP:BOLD. -- stubblyhead | T/c 07:38, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yes, that is what I want to do, but swapping the content doesn't swap the page history. That's why I'm requesting that Power supply unit be deleted... so that Power supply can be moved, keeping the history intact. ~ Booyabazooka 17:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep I agree that as Power supply and Power supply unit are currently structured, PSU is fairly well covered in the first one. I still think PSU is such a wellknown, welldefined entity it should have its own page. Medico80 11:37, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't understand; are you saying that the Power supply article should be split? ~ Booyabazooka 17:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Sorry, now I'm confused myself. Is YOUR proposal they should be two distinct articles? Medico80 19:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I don't understand; are you saying that the Power supply article should be split? ~ Booyabazooka 17:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Essentially this is a request for a merge, not deletion, so it doesn't belong here. This discussion should be brought to the respective Talk page(s). If no one has strong feelings there, Booyabazooka should be bold. -- Plutor 19:43, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, this nomination is withdrawn, because there's way too much confusion over it. I thought this would be a simple task. I'm relisting this as a requested move, as that's probably where it should have been in the first place. ~ Booyabazooka 01:37, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.