Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Priority management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 17:43, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Priority management

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced since May 2009. Two links to the company website, one to a search engine result page, and one to a book by trademark creator. Looks promotional, bordering speedy deletion. Abanima (talk) 19:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: a system of organizing work. It is a trade mark of Priority Management Systems Inc. "That is my theory, it is mine, and belongs to me and I own it, and what it is too." Exists entirely to promote a business. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent references are present in the article, and given the extremely common name it's unreasonable to ask for volunteers like us to find some to support an article that's close to WP:ARTSPAM. Pcap ping 11:37, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.