Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 13:37, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This must be a joke. This is not a major religion. Delete Mr Adequate 09:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete per nom. Any evidence this religion doesn't exist? 193.122.31.188 09:49, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a hoax. "Followers of Rainism don't attend church or "pray," so to say. The "church" experience is just watching an Our Lady Peace video, or, in desparate times, a simple interview with Raine Maida." -- Kjkolb 10:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per nom. If it does exist, it is very nn anyway. GizzaChat © 10:04, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, either a joke or an extremely non-notable religion. JIP | Talk 10:08, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nom Gu 10:22, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - joke. Eusebeus 11:18, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Plenty of silliness, very little actual funniness. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:25, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not funny, nn Celcius 14:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax, BJAODN. --Terence Ong 15:04, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can't find any mention of this religion on the Internet. Quickly overtaking Christianity? Named after the lead singer in a band? Gotta be a joke. --Clpo13 20:59, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete More Wikicrap! It doesn't even possess the virtue of humour. Fishhead64 06:45, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax, not even funny enough for BJAODN. --Kinu t/c 07:26, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Hoax, per all above. --lightdarkness (talk) 15:33, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 01:17, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.