Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rice A/S
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 00:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Rice A/S (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not seeing anything encyclopedic about this 35 employee company. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:29, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:19, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As far as I can tell all sources are primary. FuFoFuEd (talk) 15:48, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The only sources that actually mention Rice A/S are all primary: they're all just this company writing about itself. None of the secondary sources (yes, I looked at all of them) appear to mention this company. Fails WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Msnicki (talk) 19:52, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.