Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rodrigo Rodriguez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete all, fails WP:MUSIC and no non-trivial reviews were produced --Steve _(Stephen)^talk 09:47, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rodrigo Rodriguez

Lacks the necessary secondary sources to establish notability. Fails WP:Music as not released on a major label. This is a multi-nomination for the articles on his releases and the company he has set up to self-publish.

Delete all. Bridgeplayer 21:12, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Hi, can you please tell me what is secondary sources?

This article if about a notable musician,composer. ThanksÁ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Df3 (talk • contribs)

Comment - a secondary source is, for example, an article in a notable publication that favourably reviews the artist's work. Also, please stop removing the AFD template - it doesn't help and simply weakens your case. Bridgeplayer 17:23, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

Hi, This artist have alots of reviews , i display links, also he is in all Databases like All Music and Discgocs, i read the policy of nobility in Wikipedia and say this both Music data bases are notable for you it. Also he was student one of the most great masters in Japan of Japanese traditional music. Also perform in all this places like bio say. He has release two albums, and license tracks with very notable Record company.

I dont undertand what more information need this article? Its alots of bio of artists and musicians, with only 1 release in the market, and less information than Rodrigo Rodriguez, and are not deleted, like his master Kakizakai Kaoru. Please informe ?

Thanks in advance.

Delete all. On an internet search I can't find anything significant about this musician that hasn't likely been instigated by himself. What would be needed is reliable non-trivial and independent reviews of his work, or for him to meet one of the other appropriate criteria in WP:MUSIC. Basically he doesn't (yet?) appear to be famous enough to be in a general encyclopedia, IMHO. Finally, just in case it's relevant: Wikipedia is not for advertising. — Smalljim 20:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

I think you need to ask to the Editor who aprove the biography of Rodrigo Rodriguez, I submited and him aprove , becouse he is a notable artist. Famouse, New Age , or World music composer, will not apear never in magazines of Celebrities. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Koku (talk • contribs) 10:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.