Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIMPLEBOTICS
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Not notable - WP:NFT and WP:N Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 10:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- SIMPLEBOTICS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable "company" with 0 media coverage and 1 product, which is just instructions. All 3 of the articles made about this company were made by his friend. I know this is his friend, because if you follow the youtube link at the bottom you see the video called "The History of SimpleBotics (for Wikipedia)". In the description you can see that this video is for "Keith". Which logically must be the user linked above. Bluefist talk 06:19, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not even close to meeting the notability standards for a company, and unlikely to do so in the foreseeable future. SeaphotoTalk 06:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not Delete -That new type of robotics is genuinely real,its aspects are those with the beam robotics.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.34.84 (talk • contribs) 06:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Not Delete -notable.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.34.84 (talk • contribs) 06:40, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not Delete -"SIMPLEBOTICS" is like "BEAM robotics",If the BEAM robotics is in a wikipedia article,So does the SIMPLEBOTICS.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.34.84 (talk • contribs) 06:43, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
not reasons for deletion -it is notable!!!— Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.34.84 (talk • contribs) 06:47, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Just because other stuff exists, does not make it notable. Also, we can see that it's the same IP doing all these comments, as well as the one that originally deleted the Speedy Delete template. Bluefist talk 06:49, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I might be good to know to other users, that the IP above has deleted the AfD template from the page and from the AfD log. Obvious COI in my opinion. Bluefist talk 07:02, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment User:Keithosmarferrer made the same disruptive edits. The anon is obviously a sockpuppet. —teb728 t c 08:00, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete and salt. Article about a company that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Not one independent reference. Recreated after previous deletion of Simplebotics and Simplebotics®. —teb728 t c 07:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Not Delete -This article is an important part of robotics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Keithosmarferrer (talk • contribs) 07:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC) [reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.