Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Dodge (disambiguation)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Unnecessary disamb seicer | talk | contribs 00:42, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Sam Dodge (disambiguation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Unnecessary dab. The only other two entries are red links. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 15:07, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Redlinks have been there for a year with no articles forthcoming. ~ Ningauble (talk) 16:09, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Red links on dab pages are completely allowed. Red links should be included if there is a redlink on another Wiki page, and if there is evidence of notability. These 2 redlinks don't appear to be notable. Red Dawn doesn't show a 'Sam Dodge', and the appropriate imdb page suggests he is distinctly non-notable. The aviator does appear as redlink (at Aviation High School (Redondo Beach, California)) but in a list marked 'Notable Alumni' with no further info. Googling gives a possible match here (scroll down) and again he doesn't seem particularly notable, so deletion of this page is appropriate. If there was evidence of notability for the redlinks it wouldn't matter how long they had been there. Tassedethe (talk) 17:11, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Will the persecution of actors whose sole credit is "Man at Drive-In" never cease? Can't find much on the other redlink either. Delete. Clarityfiend (talk) 21:15, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I started looking at creating stubs for the the redlinks, but what little information I could find didn't show them to be sufficiently notable to justify articles. Jll (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.