Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scouting in Iraq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. Mo0[talk] 02:12, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scouting in Iraq

Delete Too short, only one line, see history comments too. This should be deleted and if anyone desires to, then recreated. Rlevse 15:30, 10 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:30, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The Scouting movement is a notable organisation. This page is so sparse in detail that it might almost not bother to exist at all. It needs to be expanded in order to justify being kept but it does in essence have a claim to validity. -- (aeropagitica) 18:52, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Contains useful information and links. Calsicol 20:43, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and Expand per aeropagitica -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 04:41, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly requires expansion :: "restarted" implies a substantial pre-history not recorded here. On the other hand, this is no more than a stub. IMHO, flag for expansion, wait 1 month and if unexpanded, delete at that time, with liberty to editors to restore later ine xpanded form. -- SockpuppetSamuelson 09:08, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, this is part of a series on Scouting in various countries. Gazpacho 10:33, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with significant cleanup. Stifle 18:06, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.