Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Service Plus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:52, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Service Plus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD by IP without addressing the issues. Concern = WP:ADVERT. Subject fails criteria at WP:ORG. Written like an advert or a press release, the sources provided are either Primary, or do not fulfill the criteria for extentsive reliable sources. The keywords in the name make Ghits impossible to locate. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:33, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. It seems to be written like an advert. Adder also seems to have re-added the article after it was previously deleted. I don't see where this particular company is notable. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:36, 16 November 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Delete. Highly promotional. Seems non-notable.--Tingo Chu (talk) 10:39, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural comment I've closed the duplicate AfD nomination and nominated the AfD page for speedy deletion under G6 Housekeeping. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:18, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 11:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks. Sorry for my mistake.--Tingo Chu (talk) 11:26, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Definitely written to advertise, doesn't appear notable, most of the sources cited are from the company's website. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 11:51, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Question Thank you very much for you attention! We have only russian sources of information, can we use this? Volume of english information is very small. Thats why we had to use information from our website. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dimitry-1983 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 16 November 2011‎

Note: Dimitry-1983 has a Conflict of Interest. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:52, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I searched in Russian about your company and didn't find anything in that language. Not much in English. Of course, there are many companies called "Service Plus" so it was hard to find anything about this particular Service Plus, but I'm convinced it's not notable. Sorry. --Madison-chan (talk) 14:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.