Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seth Jego Balibalos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 15:06, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seth Jego Balibalos

Fails WP:Notability.

Delete - Non-notable subject. User234 (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:34, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn; more advertising from the people who brought you Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/JJS_Karate_Dojo. JJL (talk) 18:09, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails Wikipedia:WikiProject_Martial_arts#Notability_guidelines for martial artists. jmcw (talk) 23:10, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why do the events he won 4 gold medals 4 not count as significant based on the guidelines? - Mgm|^(talk) 12:53, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- National Winner with online citation: http://2007.philolympicfestival.com/default.asp Mmaasia (talk) 02:38, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - pass notability guide. General points

Reliable sourcing is the most important factor. Assertions of notability must be sourced from somewhere other than the individual or organisation under discussion (see secondary sources); if referencing a tournament title, the organisation which ran the tournament would be the first stop; if the subject of an article is an author, the publisher or ISBN of the subject's work should be given. A single local newspaper article is probably not enough to assert notability, but national mention with some details or multiple local sources that "make a case" for notability. A lack of any sources after looking around is a warning sign that an article may not be notable enough for inclusion.Jjskarate (talk) 03:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin: Please consult the related AfDs Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Razhel_Mengullo, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/James_Guanzon, and Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Aaron_Lubrico, and the former AfD for the school at which these kids study, Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/JJS_Karate_Dojo. JJL (talk) 04:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Has won several awards up to national level competitions making him notable.Mmaasia (talk) 08:27, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Were the gold medals received from the Taekwondo World Cup or the Summer Olympics? Starczamora (talk) 16:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Course not, but that's because those competitions don't allow kids and it conveniently leaves out national competitions as competitions that establish noteworthy-ness. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notable perhaps in the local scene, but not in Wikipedia. Starczamora (talk) 16:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Philippines has never won gold medal in Taekwondo World Cup and last summer olympic in Beijing, China the delegation go home empty handed. So, perhaphs we'll consided new breed of athetes and support all the way from local, national up to international competitions.Mmaasia (talk) 03:18, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Secondary sources are substantial.Pinoynewbreed (talk) 00:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - National Athlete at an early age.空手道 (talk) 07:38, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable enough for a Wikipedia article in my opinion. — •KvЯt GviЯnЭlБ• ^Speak! 08:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.