🇮🇷 Iran Proxy | https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Sonel
Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonel

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails the English Wikipedia WP:CORP requirements (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:22, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sonel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indications of notability - fails WP:CORP. Unreferenced. Wikipedia is not Yellow Pages. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 19:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - It is unreferenced as there does not appear to be any. The company is publicly traded [1] in Poland; however, I fear that any notable references are in Polish and therefore will be difficult to find for those on en.Wikipedia. Would suggest listing this in articles on Poland and hopefully someone can locate and get the article sourced (appropriately of course) prior to deletion. --UsedEdgesII (talk) 20:38, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:50, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:51, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Can somebody show me Yellow Pages, where is company's history etc.? Or show me difference beetween the side about Sonel and the side about Megger or Fluke - for me, it's discrimination, that is the EN wikipedia's place for the British and US Companies, and there is no place for Polish company. (jagokogo) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jagokogo (talkcontribs) 07:46, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.