Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spiritual sequel
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro 19:23, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Appears to be a dicdef, followed by original research and an inherently POV list. No sources given. Delete. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 05:11, Jan. 12, 2006
- I get 935 Google hits which makes it somewhat notable. The article's definition that "creative teams often change employers ... [and] often create a new product that is a sequel to their previous works" makes it possible to check if an item is the product of the same creative team, thereby eliminating POV. I don't see a problem with a list like this. Keep. GeorgeStepanek\talk 05:26, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It states clearly on the Arx Fatalis article that "Arkane themselves have gone on the record stating that Arx is intended to be Ultima Underworld III, however they could not obtain a license for the UW name". Similarly, BioShock is intended by Irrational Games as a spiritual sequel to System Shock 2. Spiritual sequels are not just some concept invented by fanboys.--Drat (Talk) 06:10, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the formating is weird and could be cleaned up, but it seems fairly notable -- Astrokey44|talk 13:18, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I've definitely heard of this before. A "spiritual sequel" can be anything between fan-made and the original creator making it under a new name because a publishing company olds the copyright on the old stuff. Cyde Weys votetalk 15:28, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.