Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuffed article
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep Part Deux 03:58, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Stuffed article (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
An anonymous user slapped an afd tag on this article. I personally don't believe it needs to be deleted but I went ahead and created the afd page to get the process started since the rules don't allow me to just remove the afd tag. Nardman1 23:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced. Flyingtoaster1337 01:02, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Keep now that the word is shown to be used in Canadian government literature. Flyingtoaster1337 05:26, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I did the research and posted the references. The article is now a sourced stub. Jeepday 03:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.