Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tad Riley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:22, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tad Riley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While an interesting footnote to the cold war, simply not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 19:25, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, not notable for stand alone article. Trivia and Wikipedia is WP:Not News. Kierzek (talk) 20:24, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:12, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with no need to redirect.--Georgia Army Vet Contribs Talk 17:58, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I don't find any additional sources and this seems to be a minor 1E. Smmurphy^(Talk) 17:32, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Clear WP:SOLDIER fail mentioned in the context of flying a few recon missions.Icewhiz (talk) 11:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete totally fails our notability guidelines for soldiers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:16, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails GNG Chetsford (talk) 21:11, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails the Gng. L3X1 Happy2018! (distænt write) 02:17, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.