Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tekken theories

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per WP:SNOW. Maxim_(talk) 22:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tekken theories

Essay-like rambling about the Tekken game series. Tried to prod it, got second vote then author removed my prod. Rob Banzai (talk) 18:28, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TL;DR. Seriously, delete, long, rambling essay. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's apparently the personal observations and theories of one person. Belongs on a fansite, not Wikipedia. Bill ^{(talk|contribs)} 19:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

STAY because tekken is full of theories and not facts so it should stay. Ace2690 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ace2690 (talk • contribs) 19:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Ace2690 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

STAY because it could be a good page, base on everybodies ways of tekken i think its a good page STAY because all the facts base on tekken stories is and are theories because most of the so called facts about the story are not stated in the game. so they are theories. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Unknown2020 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Unknown2020 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

STAY because they right about it all look if you guy want to know why it should stay ask one of namco producers here is her email devil_jin_kazama@juno.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Power250 (talk • contribs) 19:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

— Power250 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete per WP:OR; unsourced, rambling personal essay. As an aside, can someone who knows the tag add an "AfD is not a vote" notice on this. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 20:11, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Anyone smell socks? Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:16, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to put in a Sockpuppet report based on the vandalism to my user page and similarity between comments and usernames (the same users you see here voting STAY) but the process is just too long and complicated. Rob Banzai (talk) 20:19, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle makes things much easier. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:30, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the smelly ones on my feet right now? Sure do. MuZemike (talk) 21:26, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unsalvageably incoherent original research, attempt to communicate, and more or less gibberish. Then put all the socks in the wash. AlexTiefling (talk) 20:44, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my support of the original prod. -- Comandante {Talk} 20:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

stay because tekken series is good and the page is just looking at the series in a defferent way, i think its cool. --nicrow-- —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:56, 30 September 2008.

— Nicrow (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete Wikipedia is not a blog, a soapbox or a publisher of original thought. Jeremiah (talk) 21:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I would like to draw the page creator's attention to the First Rule of Holes: When you are in one, stop digging. AlexTiefling (talk) 21:01, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stay The reason why I made this page is so that many fans could come and talk about the tekken game and comics series. many of us has talk to one of the tekken comic producer, and she has told us that many of tekken stories is mix up, the producer says that namco has defferent stories about tekken, and many people have question and theories. So I came up with tekken theories because namco have the game series defferent from the comics series, so i wanted to tell the defference between them, and tell the theories about them from the tekken forum fan web page base on tekken. I still want to work on the language and corrections on the page so that I can make it out of an artical. These are just theories not facts about tekken, these are forum tekken fans theories base on the comics and games series of tekken ––Teriko–– —Preceding undated comment was added at 20:42, 30 September 2008.

— Teriko (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Dude, haven't you heard the expression "less is more"? Using more words to defend yourself isn't a very effective tactic. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

STAY because these theories is good to think about, because the series is alittle mix up. --carvus-- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.240.42 (talk) 21:03, 30 September 2008

Delete - Rambling (and virtually unreadable) essay that completely ignores WP:OR, WP:SOURCES, and WP:SOAP. ~~SIS~~ 21:05, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete rambling, crufty, in-universe original research. There's probably a Tekken wiki somewhere that would like this, but not Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:08, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete poorly written WP:OR essay, no good references. --Banime (talk) 21:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MuZemike (talk) 21:13, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The article seems to just be for collection of speculation. I found a Tekken wiki but I can't find any "policy pages", so I am unsure whether it would be accepted there. NanohaA'sYuri^{Talk, My master} 21:27, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete per all of the above; it boggles the mind. MuZemike (talk) 21:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note — Above users in question have been reported as potential sockpuppets. MuZemike (talk) 21:34, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- …as well as the three below. MuZemike (talk) 21:47, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stay because its just explaining the tekken theories, from the facts. --darkryuken-- — darkryuken (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Stay because its good a little theories about some, life has theories —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrinkyaku (talk • contribs) 21:39, 30 September 2008 (UTC) — [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Stay its pretty cool to wounder about the unknown about tekken. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.142.240.42 (talk • contribs) 30 September 2008, 21:42 (UTC) — [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment: User:pyrocrow doesn't even exist; that edit was made by a numeric IP. AlexTiefling (talk) 21:50, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

delete The place where this is appropriate material is a fan blog. FWIW, a sudden group of users entering irrelevant opinions in terminology other than used here is the most transparent type of puppetry. DGG (talk) 21:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.