Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Texts from Bennett

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. Stifle (talk) 19:03, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Texts from Bennett

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unpublished book. Does publicity equal notability? DGG ( talk ) 03:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:43, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep Seems sort of notable as a blog per WP:WEB with a surprising amount of mainstream coverage in Washington Post[1], New York Observer, and other sources[2][3][4][5]. I'm not entirely sure if all the sources on the article are reliable (Smoking Gun, Gawker, Huffington Post) but this does seem to meet the generous requirements of WP:WEB or WP:GNG. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:34, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think this should be kept! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.46.134.17 (talk) 21:10, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Per coverage in reliable sources provided above. STATic message me! 12:53, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.