Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thinesh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was delete. WP:SNOW Jackmcbarn (talk) 21:11, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thinesh

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested speedy deletion for A7. The contest statement was:

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (I am A Actor Starting My Career form this year .. after i will improvw with more films) --Naysh (talk) 22:28, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No sources. BLP's must have sources. No claim to significance. Google results are social media. Mr. Guye (talk) 23:16, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete - non-notable per WP:BIO Deunanknute (talk) 00:15, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete: Subject is barely 17 (in spite his age having been originally listed as 18). There is no evidence of notability. Even if his career takes off, it is too soon and also a conflict of interest. In my opinion, this is a classic case for speedy. ubiquity (talk) 16:16, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, as this is an unsourced BLP article. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:18, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per others as non-(yet-)notable individual and unsourced BLP. ~~Is it too late to bundle Aayudham (2016 film) into this nom?~~ DMacks (talk) 21:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Name:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete per being premature. Three minor positions in non-notable films do not meet WP:ENT. Indeed, the man has no coverage (or verifiability) at all. IF his career advances and he or his works gain recognition, a WP:REFUND may be requested. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obviously. WP:NYA WP:BLP missing WP:RS. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Sadly, no evidence of notability. too soon if ever. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 19:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.