Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Small
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thomas Small (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lacking WP:RS since July 2008. Notability by WP:N not established, not obvious. ~YellowFives 18:18, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The lack of independent sources indicates lack of notability for this Thomas Small, but the Gbooks hits seem to indicate there are notable people with this name. Shouldn't this article be changed to be about one of them? Edward321 (talk) 14:26, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 00:40, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No reliable sources and notability is questionable. The name is too common to make research a casual affair. Vegaswikian (talk) 06:40, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.