Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trinity Mount Barker
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 22:34, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Trinity Mount Barker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This is an article about a proposed suburban church and is essentially an advertisement. It is not notable. Grahame (talk) 01:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:03, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability at this point. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - The sources in the article are either not independent from Trinity Mount Barker, are postings on an Internet message board, or do not have the church as their subject. There are no reliable sources which can be used to show notability. --Megaboz (talk) 04:04, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--really a kind of crystal ball (and no promise of future notability) with self-published references. Drmies (talk) 04:18, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The sources attempting to demonstrate notability include a forum and Wikipedia itself. -- Mattinbgn\talk 21:52, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:N.--Sting Buzz Me... 01:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:19, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - required independent notability not yet clearly established. John Carter (talk) 18:39, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.