Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TripodMaker
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. joe deckertalk 05:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
- TripodMaker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Written by the founder of the company with no evidence of passing WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 15:29, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability, either in the article or elsewhere. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Article lacks any prosperous information to establish notability for this company. A search doesn't result in any reliable third party coverage to render notability. After WP:BEFORE the only way for this one is delete. Mwenzangu (talk) 09:24, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.