Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twank Star
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 02:22, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Twank Star (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non notable musical artist WuhWuzDat 07:47, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.theboombox.com/2009/01/15/twank-star-captures-t-pain-ourstages-attention/
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2008/12/prweb1769374.htm
ALL NOTABLE SOURCES. "WuhWuzDat" is just trying to get every page I create deleted! Please, go bother someone else.
Kevinbarlow (talk) 17:32, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - insufficient coverage in reliable sources to pass WP:MUSIC. The sources above are either not reliable, do not provide significant coverage, or are not independent of the subject (or all of those). Robofish (talk) 01:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J04n(talk page) 18:44, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Twank Star's only significant coverage has been in relation to the "Step in the Ring" contest—there is very little coverage otherwise. I would suggest Kevinbarlow move what he has to his userpages in anticipation Star's future notability. — Bility (talk) 00:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:22, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.