Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Twisted Fortune

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Star Mississippi 17:55, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Twisted Fortune

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a film, not properly sourced as passing WP:NFILM. The only notability claim immediately apparent here is that there were actors in the cast who went on to become more notable for later work than they were at the time, which isn't a notability criterion per se -- and the only "source" cited is a directory entry in an IMDb-like database that isn't an automatic notability clincher. But even on a Google search for older sourcing, all I found was more directories, with no discernible evidence of WP:GNG-building coverage about it turning up on regular, news or books searches.
As always, we do not want to just indiscriminately keep an article about every single film that's ever been made -- a film's notability has to be established by showing that it's been a subject of coverage and analysis by film journalists and reviewers, not just by using directory entries to verify that it exists. Bearcat (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film and United States of America. Bearcat (talk) 17:58, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No sourcing of any kind found, even the ImDB and Rotten Tomoates pages are pretty bare. Delete for lack of any sourcing Oaktree b (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.