Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uniboard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 08:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Uniboard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N, at least as far as a cursory Gnews search was able to determine. I'm treating this as a contested prod, since I prodded this article a few months back, and it was deleted, but the article creator re-created it. RayTalk 04:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- - 2/0 (cont.) 19:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Insufficient notability to meet guidelines. ChildofMidnight (talk) 00:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. I can't find significant coverage of this software. JUJUTACULAR | (TALK) 00:55, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.