Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vend (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:35, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Vend (software)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small software company, fails WP:COMPANY, creator of page and main editor appears to be the marketing person for the company while another editor also appears to work at the company SimonLyall (talk) 20:31, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. SimonLyall (talk) 20:36, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The New Zealand Herald and National Business Review articles easily clear the bar for me. Both are reliable sources, the authors are independent and the articles are fairly long, only about this company and clearly contain the authors' own thoughts, not simple reprints of the company's press releases. I think this easily establishes notability with multiple reliable independent secondary sources about subject, as required by WP:GNG. Msnicki (talk) 22:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: As Msnicki notes, seems to easily meet GNG. Maury Markowitz (talk) 01:37, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Few sources seems reliable. Nickjames90 (talk) 03:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Meets WP:CORPDEPTH per the sources provided above by User:Msnicki. Northamerica1000^(talk) 10:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Msnicki. — Joaquin008 ^(talk) 10:57, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.