Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vipromwiki
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:29, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I prodded on Friday. Over the weekend, my prod has been removed by the creator (and replaced) 3 times, so I'm assuming contested. Original reason: "A not presently notable specialist wiki that appears to have just started up. The only hits are for it's own page, which is currently down, but the Google cache suggests there isn't much there at the moment." The site is back up, but requires registering by email with the admins to access any content. Doesn't appear to have too many articles though. Kateshortforbob 12:40, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Asserts no notability, cites no sources. Mystache 12:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:WEB. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Mystache, and the bafflegab doesn't make it any easier to penetrate to the lack of notable content. Accounting4Taste 18:27, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, I only had to look at the fancy banner to decide this was blatant advertising. JIP | Talk 08:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Do not delete, I was looking for a site like this one. I asked the account and the send me it. It is important notify the existence of other community dealing with other issues...[[User:JivenP]] 17:31, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.