Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Virtual Bridges

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:10, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Virtual Bridges

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to fail WP:CORP lacking any independent coverage in the article. They only have one barely notable product win4lin, which has a separate article. Pcap ping 10:52, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 10:53, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Pcap ping 10:54, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What's wrong with merging it to win4lin, then, or just redirecting? —Korath (Talk) 11:02, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There's nothing to merge. They just bought the company that made win4lin; they also discontinued it: http://win4lin.com/wp/. Their own VERDE product seems to have little if any coverage of its own. The article is doused with advertisement language: ...focusing on pioneering..., ...emphasized investment in the best-of-breed practices..., ...leverages..., etc. Pcap ping 11:17, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't know what this is trying to say, but it sure sounds like blatant advertising to me: With the emergence of Xen hypervisor technology and the introduction of virtualization capabilities in the hardware with VT, the company emphasized investment in the best-of-breed practices and functionality around the commodity hypervisor rather than focusing on the hypervisor itself. Oonh, it's best of breed we are, eh? Verra noice. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 14:21, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, NN. --Nuujinn (talk) 21:13, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.