Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vyom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.‎

The result was redirect to PEC University of Technology. What and where to merge, and whether to convert to a DAB, are all matters for standard editorial discretion. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 06:21, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vyom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sourcing, no notability either per GNG or UNIGUIDE. Lynch 7 05:08, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ striking see below Covered in Times of India here Tigerboy1966 10:51, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly not enough coverage to merit an article on its own? Maybe a sentence or even a paragraph on the college article (PEC University of Technology) would be better? Lynch 7 13:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: First, it is not notable by any means and does not pass the criteria. Second, there are many more subjects titled Vyom and the festival might be the topic of least coverage, completely disapproving the article and its title. If it is created in future, it should be done with a dab (as long as the others are created). Secret of success 13:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with PEC University of Technology article after removing the promotional/non verifiable contents-- Ðℬig XЯaɣ 14:33, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge as suggested by DBigXray. Reconsidered and changing !vote. Tigerboy1966 15:24, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.