Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Webfossil
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:02, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism with few Google hits outside of ads and plugs for the company. This article is spam for that company. De-prodded without changes by someone with the user name Webfossil, so there is a conflict of interest as well. - IceCreamAntisocial 02:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no assertion of notability - Aagtbdfoua 02:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:NEO and WP:WEB respectively. WJBscribe (WJB talk) 02:47, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above.Ganfon 03:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, is quite spam-like.--Dmz5*Edits**Talk* 03:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Spam.--Meno25 07:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:SPAM. MER-C 08:21, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Multiple topics on one article; WP:NEO; WP:SPAM. Fails WP:WEB due to only 75 unique hits. From the contrib history of Webfossil, the COI may only apply to the de-prod. John Vandenberg 23:30, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Spam. Medlat 23:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. ā ANAS Talk? 12:42, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.