Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White lie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was White redirect, boldly. NAC. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 22:11, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

White lie

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dicdef, no hope of expansion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 15:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Short dictionary definition. Wiktionary is thataway. Edison (talk) 17:13, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - to Lie, as it's already covered there. Aditya (talk) 17:45, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Lie#Types of lies. I don't see any reason to delete when it makes a very useful redirect. Bridgeplayer (talk) 18:42, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Lie#Types of lies as a plausible search term that is too much of an inherent dic-def to merit its own article. youngamerican (wtf?) 18:47, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Lie#Types of lies. The fact that it wasn't already surprises me, seems like a fairly obvious redirect. Umbralcorax (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.