Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/XPanel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Deleted and salted. jj137 (talk) 23:00, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XPanel

Promotional article, twice speedied G11, twice recreated, listed here so that it can be salted. The creator has also been reported at WP:UAA. Delete and salt. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No assertion of notability and no references. Creating editor appears to have a conflict of interest. Ros0709 (talk) 19:38, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Is the current article pretty much the exact same thing now as it was when it was deleted, or was an attempt made to correct the problem? Green caterpillar (talk) 19:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I've seen the second version, which I tagged myself. The third version, which you see listed here, is exactly the same apart from the cleanup templates. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, then I guess delete and create-protect. Green caterpillar (talk) 20:17, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and salt Obvious COI and nonnotable. Salt to prevent another unneeded creation. Themfromspace (talk) 20:16, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete & Salt Blaxthos ( t / c ) 20:36, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XPanel should be deleted and salted as an advert for a non-notable product. Oh, and I suppose the article should be deleted also, for the same reasons. ~ AmeIiorate _{U T C} @ 22:13, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.