Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zen Without Zen Masters
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete with no prejudice against the creation of an actual encyclopedic article if one can be written. — Scientizzle 07:06, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Zen Without Zen Masters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
The comment at the bottom of the article was inserted in response to a PROD, and I took it as a contestation of the PROD. However, this only convinces me that the book is a worthwhile reference to be used in articles about its topic, but that does not confer the book itself enough notability. Delete. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 00:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence of notability; token article--barely a stub. JJL (talk) 01:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Wow, I don't even understand this "article". Tavix (talk) 02:49, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No assertion of notability to meet WP:BK criteria. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 02:57, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Tavix and general states of confusion. J-ſtanContribsUser page 04:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I don't know about you over there in the US, but over here in Germany (maybe all Europe), that is quite a famous book. The article requires much cleanup, but notability isn't a problem from my POV. Can not give sources, though. --.Tom. (talk) 12:50, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.