Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhao Changjun
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 07:48, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Zhao Changjun (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This page has more or less been orphaned by the original author since Jan 2007 and there has been no significant content added to the page, also this page seems to be an advertisement for the "Zhao Changjun Wushu Institute" since that is the only notable sentence of the article Abstrakt (talk) 03:25, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per reasons above. Abstrakt (talk) 03:29, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep there is a reference to his holding 10 world wu shu championships. Otherwise its a hoax / self promotion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Annette46 (talk • contribs) 04:10, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, unless someone finds a reference verifying the claim in the article that he had 10 wushu world championship titles. I checked the website of the International Wushu Federation. They list there the results of all the world championships (which started in 1991)[1]. I looked up the results for several years, checking all weight categories, and did not find his name there. For some of the first championships they only give the names in mandarin so it is concievable that he might be somewhere in there (they lists the names in English from at least 1994 on). However, given the fact there were only 9 world wushu championships altogether, it is hard to imagine how one can hold 10 world titles. For the moment certainly fails WP:V. Nsk92 (talk) 04:48, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Ten world championship titles does sound impressive but there are no references to verify this claim. -650l2520 (talk) 05:47, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree with the above. There's no references for any of the claims in the article, so it's just original research and he doesn't meet notability. Lady Galaxy 19:22, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.