Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zhi-Li Zhang
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep: withdrawn by nominator (non-admin). JFHJr (㊟) 22:02, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
- Zhi-Li Zhang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This subject fails WP:ACADEMIC and WP:GNG. It's hard to tell what's notable; many publish a large number of papers, but he's generally co-authored (mileage varies). I'm getting an h-index on this side of stellar, though it shouldn't be a deciding factor either way. JFHJr (㊟) 07:32, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. With an h-index of 40 this is a clear pass of WP:Prof#C1, even in this highly cited field. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC).
- Keep per WP:PROF#C1 (at least a dozen papers with over 100 cites each in Google scholar, clear evidence of academic impact) and #C5 (holder of a named chair at U. Minn.) —David Eppstein (talk) 08:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.