I mean, it's a fairly run-of-the-mill April Fools' AfD—not an especially funny one, but also well within the rules that the community has set out. I have a hard time seeing that as a valid G3 since there's no indication that anyone involved was trying to harm the encyclopedia. (The creator was a sockpuppet, but other editors contributed, so it also wouldn't be a G5.) If editors think these prank AfDs have gotten out of hand (which I would tend to agree with), then the place for that conversation would be an RfC. But I would overturn this speedy, although I do think (per Robert) that these sorts of deletions are probably not worth bringing to DRV in the future. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:11, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Overturn. Based on what those who can access the deleted history said, this is a ROTM April Fools AfD that is not G3. Don't think this is worth taking to DRV though. {{ping|ClydeFranklin}} (t/c) 04:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Since there is evidently a ferling that this nonsense should be kept, I have reversed my deletion, though it is beyond me why anyone would think it a good idea to take up several editors' time by immediately starting a deletion review, rather than consulting me in the first instance. JBW (talk) 09:37, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is an archive of the deletion review of the page listed in the heading. Please do not modify it.
