Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2025 December 3

December 3

File:St. Vincenzo Grossi.jpg

Per c:COM:FOP Italy, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy. Despite my searches, I could not find any author information or date of publication (prior to 2015) to conclude that this portrait is old enough to be in the public domain. ✗plicit 00:13, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:HongSaIkTrial.jpg

Impossible to determine if this photograph is in the public domain. Lacks author information and date of publication. Since this trail took place in the Philippines, it may have first been published in that country. If that's the case, this might be in the public domain there per {{PD-Philippines}}, but copyrighted in the U.S. due to the URAA. If it was published elsewhere first, we need a source to confirm that. ✗plicit 11:56, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:BB27OfficalUS Logo.png

I'm thinking that this promo poster (Facebook) gives out more context to Big Brother 27 (American season) than this title card, despite red ripples background and a magnifying glass representing an "O". Unlike logos of Big Brother UK, one of US logos or title cards may not be well discussed by a reliable source after all. George Ho (talk) 18:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sia - Fame Won't Love You cover art.jpg

File available on Commons as File:Sia – Fame Won't Love You cover art.png. Listed here due to uploader's reversion of {{Di-replaceable non-free use}}. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 19:18, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nominated the Commons copy itself for deletion (DR discussion). --George Ho (talk) 20:07, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Little Farmer Ad.jpg

One of the frames of the advertisement that does not reflect its main idea (WP:NFCC#8 / WP:NFC#CS). — Ирука¹³ 22:30, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral, the image isn't critical but without it there is no depiction of the add besides the description in the article, which can only do so much. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 22:34, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I would like to note that the frame is one of the most common depictions of the advert that I have seen and I pulled it from an article. ✶Quxyz✶ (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem of Kluang North District Council.png

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Whpq (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The emblem section is written entirely from a primary source, which is no longer a good thing (WP:SCHOLARSHIP). Based on this, as well as WP:WEIGHT, I propose deleting the outdated images by 3, 6 and 8 points of WP:NFCC. — Ирука¹³ 23:28, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I added them because they have historical value that otherwise would not be adequate for me to explain the emblem's evolution. Hongqilim (talk) 00:07, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Emblem of Kluang Municipal Council (2001–2018).png

The emblem section is written entirely from a primary source, which is no longer a good thing (WP:SCHOLARSHIP). Based on this, as well as WP:WEIGHT, I propose deleting the outdated images by 3, 6 and 8 points of WP:NFCC. — Ирука¹³ 23:29, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to keep the old municipal emblem while deleting the district council emblem. Is that ok? Hongqilim (talk) 18:54, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]