Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Lithium/1
Appearance
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
There are uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. There is an "expand section" orange banner at the top of "pricing": is this still valid? Z1720 (talk) 01:37, 30 November 2025 (UTC)
- The article is in a sorry state, looks like the typical case of crust accumulation without any major rewrite or update to keep it as a coherent whole... I also see a lot of MOS violations, some duplicate refs, and other issues that I do not think can be remediated without major effort. Choucas0 🐦⬛⋅📬⋅📜 15:29, 5 December 2025 (UTC)