Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/JRH95

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a request for adminship that did not succeed. Please do not modify it.

JRH95

Ended at (0/5/0) per WP:NOTNOW - untranscluded nomination by new editor

JRH95 (talk · contribs) – Beginning editor looking to fight and apprehend internet vandals. JRH95 (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia as an administrator. It is recommended that you answer these optional questions to provide guidance for participants:

1. What administrative work do you intend to take part in?

A: Fight against WikiVandals.

2. What are your best contributions to Wikipedia, and why?

A: I work on small articles. I make small but significant changes.

3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or have other users caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?

A:Yes, some people have bugged me. I published to the Talk page, and when it didn't work, I just left the other user alone.

General comments

Links for JRH95: JRH95 (talk · contribs · deleted · count · AfD · logs · block log · lu · rfar · spi)

Please keep discussion constructive and civil. If you are unfamiliar with the nominee, please thoroughly review Special:Contributions/JRH95 before commenting.

Discussion

I think this RFA should be closed immediatly. Comments are welcome. Leujohn ^(talk) 11:03, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Oppose

This is a joke nomination. The user's primary "work" so far has been to push the conspiracy theory that Barack Obama is not a U.S. Citizen. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 03:43, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No. Nononono. No. Just...no. HalfShadow 04:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose Editor isn't even established, he's been here for about 15 edits. Whoever supports this, I hope you have a good reason.— Dæ dαlus^Contribs /_Improve 04:50, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose JRH95, it's great that you're excited about vandal-hunting, but you don't need to be an admin to do it. Check out this article and you'll be well on your way to vandal-hunting. Also, lay off the conspiracy theories. FlyingToaster 07:40, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Very Strong Oppose 13 edits as of now. Enough said. Leujohn ^(talk) 10:55, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PS: If this RFA is succesful, I'm gonna go for RFA.

Neutral

The above adminship discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.