Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ragusino

If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ragusino}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Ragusino

request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 12:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Ragusino (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
190.21.84.149 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · proxy check · block user · block log · cross-wiki contribs · CheckUser (log))

Code letter: F

Supporting evidence: Ragusino is currently blocked [1] for edit warring at Junije Palmotić, Marin Bunić and House of Bunić/Bona. See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/3RR#Ragusino_reported_by_AlasdairGreen27_.28Result:_31_hours_.29. He has reverted during the edit war from his IP address while logged out on various occasions [2] [3][4][5] and has now done so in deliberate contravention of his block [6][7].
Evidence that this is Ragusino's IP: Editing his own user page while logged out [8][9][10][11]
Note: Other current thread related to Ragusino: Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Ragusino_revert-warring.

AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Both Ragusino and 190.21.84.149 (talk · contribs) are now blocked one week per the behavioral evidence in this report. I would still appreciate any additional info that checkuser is able to provide, since this is a case of long-term edit-warring by Ragusino on the Dalmatian articles. It is possible that a much longer block for Ragusino may be considered at some point. EdJohnston (talk) 15:29, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CheckUser is not for fishing. The block has already been made per WP:DUCK -- there is no useful evidence that CU can provide. Unless there is evidence of long-term sockpuppetting, an "on the off-chance" check is unwarranted. Sam Korn ^(smoddy) 20:16, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.