Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bilateral relations

WP:DSBILATERALWP:DSBILATERAL

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Bilateral relations. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. Also, indicate the title of the article in the edit summary as it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Bilateral relations|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.

There are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Bilateral relations. For the other XfD's, the process is the same as AfD (except {{Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/PageName}} is used for MFD and {{transclude xfd}} for the rest). For PRODs, adding a link with {{prodded}} will suffice.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.

Archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at:

WikiProject Deletion sorting/Bilateral relations/archive

Purge page cache

watch

Bilateral relations

International Summit Council for Peace

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject is a non-notable Unification Church affiliated organization. Current sourcing fails to show notability. After close to 3 years with a more citations tag, the current citations are:

1 RS partially Unification Movement funded source that gives a bare mention in a list of other UC affiliated organization

5 primary sources reprinting speeches from ISCP or press releases by the ISCP or their speakers

1 source giving a close paraphrase of a speech from an ISCP conference

With the exception of the bare mention in the middle of list of other similar UC organizations in ~~Freedom of Belief~~ The Journal of CESNUR which is partially funded by the Unification Movement (included in it's entirety below), all the sources are exclusively interested in the attendees, not the ISCP itself. This clearly fails WP:INHERITORG, which says An organization is not notable merely because a notable person or event was associated with it. A corporation is not notable merely because it owns notable subsidiaries. The organization or corporation itself must have been discussed in reliable independent sources for it to be considered notable. Some notable people have spoken at ISCP conferences, but ISCP is not itself notable.

The UPF is active through a number of specialized organizations, each of which holds its own events:
The International Association of Parliamentarians for Peace (IAPP)

The International Summit Council for Peace (ISCP)

The International Association of First Ladies for Peace (IAFLP)

The Interreligious Association for Peace and Development (IAPD)

The International Media Association for Peace (IMAP)

The International Association of Academicians for Peace (IAAP)

The International Association for Peace and Economic Development (IAED)

[...]
The Interreligious Association for Peace and Development (IAPD) has been launched on November 13, 2017, in Seoul, as a partner association of IAPP. More than 60,000 attended the event at the Seoul World Cup Stadium. The idea behind IAPD is that the aims pursued by the IAPP parliamentarians, and by UPF in general, also have a spiritual dimension, and that dialogue between religions is a necessary pre-condition for peace. Regional meetings have gathered representatives of most major religions.
— The Journal of CESNUR

CamAnders (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC) Edited: 10:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CamAnders (talk) 05:40, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 November 18. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links? I don't understand, yesterday I found and opened all those links again. Therefore, all Wikipedia users can open those articles and verify all sources of information.

In any case, let other WP editors check all the sources of information and make a decision. I will accept the decision of the WP community.

If other WP editors conclude that the sources of information are not reliable or that they are dead links (which I do not agree with because I opened all the links without any problems) and that it is not an important topic for Wikipedia, I will accept such a decision. DanielCro (talk) 10:17, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Daniel, I think you meant to reply to me on this page. I've replied there accordingly. CamAnders (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK thank you very much.

Below is my answer on other page.

You are right about that one link, but all the other 4-5 links that I added yesterday are fine, the sources can be verified, and the additional content and information prove that this is an important article about a very important political initiative, for Wikipedia and beyond.

Thank you for your help and support trying to search for archives in order to rescue missing articles, I'm really grateful to you for this effort.

This only shows how important the WP community and mutual support are in achieving a common goal, sharing important information with the public DanielCro (talk) 13:53, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Organizations, and Politics. jolielover♥talk 10:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 17:14, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Left guide (talk) 18:58, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to UPF World Summit. This Council happens as part of that larger event, I see no reason to discuss it separately. Among the sources present in the article, this Nigerian one is probably the best. Kelob2678 (talk) 20:46, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]