User talk:Bsawhuwuhsixp

George Washington

When the vice president & the presidential successor, are the same person? We link to the presidential successor, in the infoboxes. GoodDay (talk) 20:35, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

Hello, I'm TonySt. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to George Washington have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. tony 18:58, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User:TonySt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --pro-anti-air ––>(talk)<–– 19:04, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:DeadbeefBot, you may be blocked from editing. tony 19:14, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:DeadbeefBot. tony 19:17, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will ban you Bsawhuwuhsixp (talk) 22:28, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bsawhuwuhsixp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Banned ScottishFinnishRadish (talk)

Decline reason:

This account is not blocked. Should it be? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:47, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bsawhuwuhsixp (talk) 16:11, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I guarantee you that there's no loophole that magically will let you ban an administrator. The only thing this type of conduct can do is make your block longer, or even indefinite. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 21:34, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bots and Template:Vandalism information

Regarding Special:Diff/1326761597 – please take a look at history of User:EnterpriseyBot/defcon, which is linked in the documentation of Template:Vandalism information. —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading edit summaries

Please stop using misleading edit summaries, as you did in Special:Diff/1326676204. "rvv" should be used only when reverting vandalism. See Wikipedia:Glossary#Rvv. —⁠andrybak (talk) 00:40, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]